Offering Worldwide Shipping & FREE Shipping on ALL US Orders!


This section doesn’t currently include any content. Add content to this section using the sidebar.

Image caption appears here

Add your deal, information or promotional text

Is Cremation More Environmentally Friendly Than Burial?

The environmental impact of cremation versus burial is a topic of debate and can depend on various factors and choices made in each process. Here's a comparison of the two in terms of environmental considerations:


1. Resource Use: Cremation uses fewer natural resources than traditional burial, particularly if no burial of the urn takes place. There's no need for a burial plot, casket, or vault.

2. Carbon Emissions: Cremation requires energy, primarily from natural gas, to heat the cremation chamber to high temperatures. This releases carbon dioxide (CO2) and other pollutants into the atmosphere.

3. Mercury Emissions: People with dental amalgam fillings release mercury during cremation. However, the actual amount of mercury released and its environmental impact varies and is a subject of ongoing research.

4. Land Use: Cremation requires less land than burial, especially if the ashes are scattered or kept in a home urn.


1. Chemical Pollution: Traditional embalming uses formaldehyde, a toxic chemical that can leach into the soil over time. However, not all burials involve embalming.

2. Resource Use: Traditional burials use natural resources, such as hardwoods for caskets and concrete or metals for vaults.

3. Land Use: Cemeteries take up land space, which could otherwise be used for natural habitats or other purposes.

4. Decomposition Emissions: Decomposing bodies release methane, a potent greenhouse gas. However, the amount and impact can vary based on numerous factors.

5. Green Burials: An environmentally-friendly alternative to traditional burial is "green" or "natural" burial. In green burials, the body is not embalmed, and biodegradable coffins or shrouds are used. This method reduces the environmental footprint of burial by eliminating harmful chemicals and non-biodegradable materials.


1. Final Resting Place: If a cremated individual's remains are placed in a non-biodegradable urn and then buried in a cemetery, it still utilizes land. Similarly, if an urn is made from materials that don't degrade, it might not be much different from burying a casket in terms of the item's persistence in the environment.

2. Cultural and Religious Beliefs: For many people, the choice between cremation and burial is deeply rooted in cultural, religious, or personal beliefs, and these considerations might outweigh environmental concerns.

3. Personalization: Both cremation and burial offer opportunities for eco-friendly personalization. For instance, some choose biodegradable urns or memorial reefs (structures placed on the ocean floor to support marine life) for cremated remains.

In summary, while both cremation and burial have environmental impacts, the specific environmental footprint can vary based on choices made in each process. It's essential to weigh personal, cultural, and religious factors alongside environmental considerations when making a decision.

Leave a comment (all fields required)

Comments will be approved before showing up.